UK Tender Software Compared

An honest comparison of the UK public-sector tender platforms — including which one is right for you, even when that is not PSIP. Facts sourced from each provider’s own public pages.

Which tender platform is right for you?

The short version — pick by what you actually need

PlatformBest forEntry price
PSIPthat’s usSMEs wanting procurement intelligence — spend, incumbents and AI drafting in one placefrom £199/mo
StotlesOrganisations that need decision-maker contact discoveryfree / £75+/mo
TussellEnterprises needing deep spend analysis across government~£11,400/yr
Tracker IntelligenceHistoric market intelligence and long-archive researchon request
Tenders DirectSimple, human-curated tender discoveryfrom ~£113/mo
TenderlakeInternational / EU opportunity searchfrom £249/mo

Feature & service comparison

PSIP vs Stotles, Tussell, Tracker Intelligence, Tenders Direct and Tenderlake

includedLimited partial / higher tier not offered
Feature / service
PSIP
from £199/mo
Stotles
free / £75+/mo
source ↗
Tussell
~£11,400/yr
source ↗
Tracker
on request
source ↗
Tenders Direct
from ~£113/mo
source ↗
Tenderlake
from £249/mo
source ↗
Coverage & discovery
UK portal coverage5 official portalsFaTS, CF, PCS, Sell2Wales, eTendersNI100+ portalsUK-wideAll UK + ROI500+ sourcesincl. buyer portalsUK + EU
EU / international coverageTED/EU + USEU / globalUK+IE+EU192 countries
Multi-portal tender alerts
AI relevance scoring (with explanation)✓ 1–10, every planLimitedAI qualifyLimitedAria summaries✓ capability match
Market intelligence
Invoice-level spend data✓ CH-matched, council-deepLimitedinvoiced spend records✓ 100M+ linesLimitedSpend Analysis
Incumbent payment history (per opportunity)Limitedspend patterns✓ per supplierLimitedLimitedwho holds it (no £)
Buyer intelligence / profilesLimitedLimited
Competitor / supplier tracking
Contract expiry / renewal radar
Decision-maker contacts✓ 180k+✓ 80k+✓ 85k
Bid execution
Bid/no-bid qualification scorecardLimitedLimited
AI bid drafting✓ evidence-gated✓ Bid Studio
Drafting won’t invent your facts
Pricing & access
Transparent published pricing
Entry price£199/mo£0 / £75/mo~£11,400/yron request~£113/mo£249/mo
Monthly billing, no lock-inLimitedannual pricing
Free trial✓ 14-day✓ free tier✓ 3-day✓ 7-day✓ 7-day
Self-serve signupLimitedhybrid

Every competitor claim links to the provider’s own page (headers above and sources below). Last checked July 2026 — pricing and features change; verify on each provider’s site.

Where PSIP isn’t the strongest — honestly

A few rows go against us, and we’d rather say so: source breadth — we cover the five official UK portals where the large majority of opportunities are published, but broad-scrape tools also index individual council e-procurement portals (In-Tend, Delta), so they list more raw sources; decision-maker contacts — Stotles, Tussell and Tracker sell contact databases and we don’t; and EU / international — we’re UK-focused. PSIP is built for suppliers who want the spend and incumbent intelligence to decide which UK bids to chase, then draft them grounded in that data.

PSIP is probably not for you if…

  • You only need free tender alerts the free government portals (Contracts Finder, Find a Tender) or Stotles’ free tier will do the job.
  • You only bid once or twice a year a subscription won’t pay back — a pay-as-you-go bid consultancy or the free portals make more sense.
  • You need EU or international procurement Tenderlake, Tracker or Tenders Direct cover more countries.
  • You only want a contact database Stotles, Tussell or Tracker sell decision-maker contacts; we don’t.

The players at a glance

One line each, with the source we checked

PSIP

UK SME platform — the full bundle: 5-portal discovery, AI 1–10 scoring, transaction-level council spend and incumbent data, bid pipeline and evidence-gated AI drafting, self-serve from £199/mo.

Stotles

Closest rival — strong free tier, decision-maker contacts and Bid Studio drafting, but the useful intelligence sits at £475–£990/mo and its spend data is thinner.

Tussell

Enterprise spend-intelligence authority (100M+ invoice lines), but demo-gated at ~£11,400/yr, annual-only, and no bid drafting.

Tracker Intelligence

Established BI with a deep archive and contacts, but pricing is quote-only and it offers AI summaries rather than drafting.

Tenders Direct

Human-curated coverage with published annual pricing and 500+ sources, but no AI, spend data or drafting.

Tenderlake

AI matching across UK/EU/global with a 24-month renewal forecast, but no spend intelligence and explicitly not a bid-writing tool.

Frequently asked questions

Which tender software is best for UK SMEs?

For finding opportunities cheaply, free tiers work (Stotles, BidStats). For deciding which bids to win with real spend and incumbent intelligence — and then drafting them — PSIP bundles that self-serve from £199/month, where rivals gate it to enterprise tiers or do not offer it.

Which platform is best for decision-maker contacts?

Stotles, Tussell and Tracker all sell verified contact databases. PSIP does not offer contacts — it focuses on spend, incumbent and buyer intelligence instead.

Which is best for enterprise spend analysis?

Tussell, which holds 100M+ invoice lines across UK government. PSIP offers council-deep, Companies-House-matched spend at SME pricing, surfaced inside the bid workflow.

Which tender platforms include AI bid drafting?

PSIP (evidence-gated, from the Growth plan) and Stotles (Bid Studio), plus specialist writers like AutogenAI. Tussell, Tracker, Tenders Direct and Tenderlake do not draft bids.

Does PSIP cover EU or international tenders?

No — PSIP focuses on the five official UK portals. For EU or global coverage, Tenderlake, Tracker and Tenders Direct cover more countries.

Sources & method. Compiled July 2026 from each provider’s public pricing and product pages: Stotles · Tussell · Tracker · Tenders Direct · Tenderlake. Competitors’ pricing and features change frequently — figures were correct at the date shown; verify on each provider’s own site. Comparison prepared by PSIP; all trademarks belong to their respective owners.